SEZ Unit In India Is A Territory Deemed To Be Outside India, No Excise Duty Payable On Manufacturing Goods: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the SEZ Act exempts all duties in respect of the goods manufactured in the Special Economic Zones (SEZ). The bench of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and Raju (Technical Member) has observed that since the SEZ unit has been excluded from the levy of the duty of excise, the same exclusion shall apply...

CHA's Employees Can't Be Penalised On Charge Of Wrong Availment Of Drawback By Exporter: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the employees of Customs House Agent (CHA) cannot be penalized on charge of wrong availment of drawback by the exporter.The bench of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and Raju (Technical Member) has observed that the appellants are neither the exporter of the goods nor the CHA. The entire case...

No Service Tax Payable On Clinical Trial On Drugs Supplied By Foreign Service Recipient: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has observed that no service tax is payable on the activity of clinical trials on the drugs supplied by the foreign service recipient.The bench of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and C.L. Mahar (Technical Member) has observed that the activity of clinical trials on the drugs supplied by the foreign service...

Commission Deducted In Sale Invoice To Foreign Buyer Is Not Chargeable To Service Tax: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the commission deducted in the sale invoice of the appellant to their foreign buyer is not chargeable to service tax.The bench of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and C.L. Mahar (Technical Member) has observed that there is no contract between the appellant and the foreign-based service provider,...

Penalty Under Central Excise Rules Can Only Be Imposed On Natural Person And Not Against Artificial Entity: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the penalty under central excise rules can only be imposed on natural persons and not against artificial entities.The bench of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and Raju (Technical Member) has observed that the department has filed an appeal only against M/s Richardson and Cruddas Limited, and no name...

Arranging Package Tour Can't Be Classified As Tour Operator Service, No Service Tax Payable: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that no service tax is payable on arranging package tours.The bench of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and C.L. Mahar (Technical Member) has observed that the service cannot be classified under Tour Operator Service as arranging the package tour does not involve all the activities that are required...

CESTAT Weekly Round-Up: 4 To 10 August 2024

ACD Refund Claim Can't Be Rejected For Non-Mentioning Of Period Particulars In CA Certificate: CESTATCase Title: M/s. Jumar Trade Links Versus Commissioner of Customs (Exports)The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the Additional Duty of Customs (ADC) refund claim cannot be rejected for mere non-mentioning of period particulars in the...

No Service Tax Payable On Laying Down Water Supply Pipelines For Govt.: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the assessee is not liable to pay service tax for the activity undertaken by them for laying down the pipelines for government/government undertakings for supply of water from KWA in Thiruvananthapuram City. The bench of Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) and K. Anpazhakan (Technical Member) has...

Composite Contracts Can't Be Taxed Under “Erection, Commissioning And Installation Services”: CESTAT

The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has observed that composite contracts involving supply of both goods and services could not have been taxed under the category “Erection, Commissioning, and Installation Services.”.The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that the taxable...

CESTAT Quashes SCN Issued Against Fruit Seller Not Engaged In Any Service Tax Leviable Activity

The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has quashed the show cause notice issued against fruit sellers who are not engaged in any service tax-leviable activity.The bench of Suvendu Kumar Pati (Judicial Member) and Anil G. Shakkarwar (Technical Member) has observed that the show cause notice did not establish that the appellant was providing any...

Promotion And Marketing Services Not “Intermediary Services”, Australian Company Eligible For 'Export Of Services Benefits': CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the promotion and marketing services provided by the Australian company to foreign educational universities and institutions do not fall under the category of “intermediary services,” and the assessee is eligible for the benefit of the export of services.The bench of S. S. Garg (Judicial...

BOI Entitled Service Tax Refund Paid On Commission Charges For Credit Facility: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Bank of India is eligible for refund of service tax paid on commission charges for granting credit facility subject to verification.The bench of Sulekha Beevi C.S. (Judicial Member) and Vasa Seshagiri Rao (Technical Member) has observed that the appellant bank has satisfied all the conditions...