Communication Modules Are Imported Independently, Not As Part Of Communication Hubs Or Smart Meters: CESTAT Quashes Customs Duty

The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has stated that imported communication modules function independently as parts of communication hubs, classifiable under CTI 8517 70 90. The Bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) have observed that “since the communication modules were imported, they should...

Goods Loaded Without Proper Documents Can't Be Exported Without Clearance By Customs Officials: CESTAT Kolkata Sets Aside Penalty

Stating that goods wrongly loaded by the steamer agent could not have been exported without clearance by the Customs officials themselves, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata set aside the penalty imposed under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The provision stipulates a penalty for attempting to export goods improperly. The Appellant, a...

Payments Made During Investigation Without SCN Do Not Constitute Payments Against Demand: CESTAT

The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has stated that the payment made by the assessee during an investigation, without any Show Cause Notice, cannot be considered as payment against a demand raised by the Department without even going into the merits of the nature of demand. The Bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) has observed...

No Evidence Of Over-Valuation Of Goods; Transaction Value Wrongly Rejected Under Rule 8 of Customs Valuation Rules: CESTAT

The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has stated that there is no evidence of over-valuation of Goods and the transaction value has been wrongly rejected under Rule 8 of Customs Valuation Rules. Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1952 provides the list of goods that are liable to be confiscation if they are attempted to...

EPS-ECU Meant Solely For Use In Automobiles With Power Steering: CESTAT Delhi Classifies Same Under CTI 8708 94 00

While finding that the EPS-ECU is meant solely for use in automobiles with power steering, the CESTAT New Delhi held that EPS-ECU, which is essentially a part of an automobile specifically designed to be a part of power steering and which has no other function, cannot be classified in the general residual entry of electrical machines and equipment. Hence, the CESTAT classified the...

Attempt To Export SCOMET Item Without Authorization Is Serious Violation; CESTAT Upholds Penalty Against Customs Broker

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that an attempt to export specialized chemicals, organisms, machinery, equipment, and technology (SCOMET) items without the required authorization is a serious violation.The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and P. V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) has observed that there is no evidence of...

Samsung India Entitled To Customs Duty Exemption On Imported IC-Codecs: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Samsung India is entitled to customs duty exemption on imported IC-Codecs.The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and P. V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) has observed that HSN Explanatory Notes to CTH 8542 provide that monolithic ICs may be in the form of un-diced wafers. The IC-Codecs, as...

Hybrid/Pure Matrix Cards For PTN Equipment Classifiable Under CTI 8517 70 10: CESTAT Quashes Customs Duty Against Vodafone Idea

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Hybrid/Pure Matrix Cards for PTN Equipment would be classifiable under CTI 8517 70 10 as “parts of goods, and Small Form Factor Pluggable for Packet Transport Network (PTN) Equipment would be classifiable under CTI 8517 70 90.The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao...

Customs Brokers Not Liable Once Verification Of Address Is Completed: Delhi CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the responsibility of the customs broker under Regulation 10(n) does not include keeping continuous surveillance on the client to ensure that he continues to operate from that address and has not changed his operations. The bench of Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) and P. V. Subba Rao (Technical...

Dept. Can't Challenge Customs Duty Demand, Below Threshold Limit Prescribed By CBIC: CESTAT

The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), while dismissing the department's appeal, held that the department is precluded from challenging the commissioner's order if customs duty demand is below the threshold limit prescribed by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC).The bench of S. S. Garg (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani...

Responsibility Of Customs Broker Does Not Include Keeping Continuous Surveillance On Client: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the responsibility of the customs broker under Regulation 10(n) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 does not include keeping continuous surveillance on the client.The bench of Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) has observed that the responsibility of the...

Aircraft Used Only For Providing Non-Scheduled Passenger Services Entitled For Customs Exemption: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the aircraft used only for providing non-scheduled passenger services is entitled to customs exemption.The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and P. V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) has observed that the conditions of exemption notification were not complied with as the appellant therein had not...