High Court of J & K and Ladakh
Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SCN Regarding Export Of Banned Yarn Shawls
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Courts have held that jurisdiction in the case of shawls containing prohibited material lies in Delhi, not Jammu & Kashmir, as the seizure took place in Delhi.The bench of Chief Justice N. Kotiswar Singh and Justice M.A. Chowdhary has observed that in the absence of any specific pleadings in the writ petitions as well as memoranda of appeals, it cannot be said that any part of the cause of action had accrued to the appellant-petitioner at Srinagar.One...
English Translated Copy Certified By A Sworn Or Official Translator Is Sufficient Compliance Of Section 47(2) Of The A&C Act: J&K High Court
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir High Court has held that filing of an English translated copy certified by an official or sworn translator satisfies the requirement of Section 47(2) of the A&C Act which provides that if an award is in a foreign language, a translated copy of the award is to be filed for the purpose of the enforcement of the foreign award and the same has to be certified by the Consular or Diplomatic agent of the award holder’s country. The bench of Justice...
J&K Arbitration And Conciliation Act | Filing Application U/S 5 Not Bar To Referral For Arbitration U/S 8(1): High Court
The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has clarified that filing of the application under Section 5 of the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997 cannot be construed as a submission of statement of the substance of the dispute within the meaning of Section 8(1) of the Act to create a legal bar in referring the matter to an arbitratorSection 8(1) of the Act prescribes that an application to refer parties to arbitration should be made before submitting the first statement on...
Bank Not Obliged To Deduct TDS From FDR Interest To Jammu Development Authority: Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that the assessee bank shall not be obliged to deduct TDS from the interest payments made to the Jammu Development Authority (JDA) on its amount kept in FDRs.The bench of Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Javed Iqbal Wani has observed that the JDA is similar to the Agra Development Authority, constituted under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, and NOIDA, established under the Uttar Pradesh...
J&K Roads Development Agency Is Exempted From TDS Deduction On TD Account Interest: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court has held that the J&K State Rural Roads Development Agency (JKSRRDA) is exempt from TDS deduction on interest income accrued on Term Deposit Accounts.The bench of Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Puneet Gupta has observed that JKSRRDA is a society registered under the J&K Societies Registration Act, 1998, and is a body wholly financed by the Central Government for implementation of PMGSY and, therefore, exempt from TDS in terms of Notification No. 3489...
Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SCN Regarding Export Of Banned Yarn Shawls
The Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice regarding the export of banned yarn shawls.The bench of Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul has observed that the act of respondents in seizing consignments or goods took place in Delhi, followed by other events including the issuance of show cause notices, etc., so it is the courts or forums in Delhi where the petitioner can lay his claim or raise his grievances.The petitioner has...
No Appeal Or Revision Against Delay Condonation In Filing Application U/S 34 For Setting Aside Arbitral Award: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that no appeal or revision would lie against an order allowing an application for condonation of delay accompanying an application filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for setting aside arbitral award.A bench of Justice Javed Iqbal Wani said the legislature by using expression an appeal shall lie from the orders provided therein "and from no others" in Section 37 (Appealable orders) has taken away the right to...
GST Budgetary Support Scheme Can’t Be Interpreted Liberally: J&K And Ladakh High Court
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Courts have held that the GST Budgetary Support Scheme cannot be interpreted liberally.The bench of Chief Justice N. Kotiswar Singh and Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul has observed that the new scheme provides certain benefits by way of budgetary support to such units that were granted excise duty exemption under an earlier tax regime prior to the introduction of the GST regime. However, budgetary support is conditional and not blanket.Upon the introduction...
Requirement To Refer The Claims To Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) Is Mandatory: Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh HC
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has held that the requirement to refer the dispute to DAB, as per the GCC of FIDIC Contracts, is mandatory and the failure to comply with the provision results in making the dispute non-arbitrable. The bench of Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul held that when the agreement between the parties provides for reference of claims to DAB as pre-arbitration requirement and also provides for the consequences for the non-compliance, the parties must necessarily...








