ITAT
Incorrect Assumption Of Facts Alone Is No Basis To Revoke Revisionary Jurisdiction U/s 263: Rajkot ITAT
On finding that the PCIT has held the assessment order passed by AO as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue simply based on incorrect assumption of facts, the Rajkot ITAT directed to set aside the order passed u/s 263 of the Income tax Act, 1963. The ITAT explained that the assessment order needs to be erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interest of...
Jaipur ITAT Directs Dept. To Allow Taxpayer To File Revised Appeal Memo In Form No. 35 For Removal Of Deficiency
While relegating the taxpayer to file a revised appeal memo in Form No. 35 either on the e-filing portal of the department or physical form, the Jaipur ITAT restored the matter back to the file of the CIT(A) to adjudicate the matter of rectification application for removal of deficiency, afresh, as per law. The Bench of the ITAT comprising of Sandep Gosain (Judicial Member) And M....
Assessment Order Passed In The Name Of Non-Existent Entity Is Void Ab Initio: ITAT
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an assessment order passed in the name of a non-existent entity is void ab initio.The bench of Saktijit Dey (Vice President) and Dr. B.R.R. Kumar (Accountant Member) has observed that the merger of Boeing International Corporation India Ltd. with Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. was very much in the knowledge of the Assessing...
ITAT Restores Matter Back To AO To Verify ICSI's Income Tax Exemption Claim
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has restored the matter back to the AO to verify the Institute of Company Secretaries of India's (ICSI) income tax exemption claim.The bench of Astha Chandra (Judicial Member) and N.K. Billaiya (Accountant Member) has observed that the claim of the assessee needs verification. It would be judicially expedient to restore the matter back...
Revisionary Jurisdiction U/s 263 Can't Be Invoked If AO Has Formed Plausible View After Carrying Out Necessary Enquiry: Chandigarh ITAT
Finding that the assessee has carried out seasonal trade in hosiery items duly supported by documentary evidence, which was duly examined by the AO accepting the said transactions and resultant profit has been brought to tax, the Chandigarh ITAT held that the PCIT cannot be permitted to invoke his jurisdiction u/s 263 merely because he believes that there is certain deficiency in...
Vehicle Commercially Used For Purpose Of Business Of Company, Eligible For Benefit Of Depreciation : Ahmedabad ITAT
Relying on the decision of the Jurisdictional High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Asian Mills (P.) Ltd., the Ahmedabad ITAT that vehicle exclusively used by an entity for its commercial purpose becomes eligible for claim of depreciation. The Bench of Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member) and Madhumita Roy (Judicial Member) observed that “car is commercially used for the purpose...
Receipt Of Huge Sale Consideration In Cash Is Violative To Sec 269SS, And Calls For Levy Of Penalty U/s 271D: Chennai ITAT
The Chennai ITAT recently clarified that receipt of sale consideration of huge amount of Rs. 1.60 Crores in cash, which is, in violation of the provisions of section 269SS (this section restricts cash receipts over & above twenty thousand) of the Income tax Act, rightly deserves levy of penalty u/s 271D. The Bench of V. Durga Rao (Judicial Member) & Manjunatha, G....
Taxpayer Should Acquire Residential House Within Three Years From Date Of Transfer Of Old House, For Claiming Benefit Of Capital Gains U/s 54: Delhi ITAT
Finding that the assessee has not fulfilled either of the conditions mentioned in Section 54 of the Income tax Act, the New Delhi ITAT held that there is no infirmity in the orders of the I-T Authorities in denying the benefit of deduction of long term capital gains to the assessee u/s 54. The Division Bench of N.K. Billaiya (Accountant Member) and Yogesh Kumar U.S (Judicial...
Once Insurance Policy Is Assigned By Employer To Employee, Value Received By Employee Can't Be Taxed In View Of Sec 10(10D): Delhi ITAT
The New Delhi ITAT recently reiterated that once insurance policy is assigned by the employer to employee, the insurance policy gets converted into an ordinary policy, and in that case, the value received by employee would not be subjected to tax in view of section 10(10D) of the Act. Referring to the decision of Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs Rajan Nanda [2012] 18...
Incorrect calculation by AO Is Not 'Failure On Part Of Taxpayer To Disclose Material Fact', For Initiating Reopening: Ahmedabad ITAT
The Ahmedabad ITAT ruled that mathematical incorrectness by AO cannot be said to be failure on the part of the assessee to disclose any material fact, so as to initiate reopening of assessment. The Bench of Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member) and Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member) observed that “as rightly pointed out by the counsel for the assessee, escapement of income as per...
No Reference Can Be Made To DVO Once Value Of Capital Asset Declared By Taxpayer Is More Than FMV: Chennai ITAT
Finding that value determined by the DVO is less than the valuation adopted by assessee for computing fair market value (FMV), the Chennai ITAT ruled that the value adopted by the DVO cannot be taken for computing FMV. The Bench of Mahavir Singh (Vice President) and Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) observed that “where value of capital assets shown by the assessee being...
Payment From Google Towards Marketing & Distribution Rights Of AdWords Is Not Royalty, Clarifies Bangalore ITAT
Following the Coordinate Bench ruling in IT(IT)A No.2845/Bang/2017, wherein it was held that the payment made by Google India to assessee was not in the nature of royalty/ FTS and consequently it could not be brought to tax in the hands of assessee, the Bangalore ITAT ruled that amount received by Google Ireland (Assessee) from Google India towards marketing & distribution...