Failure Of Assessee To Give Proper Reasons For Not Appearing Before The Tax Authorities: ITAT Imposes Cost

The Banglore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) consisting of B.R. Baskaran (Accountant Member) has imposed a cost of Rs.10,000 on the assessee for the failure to give proper reasons for not appearing before the tax authorities.The assessee/appellant is the director of the group company named M/s. Panama Nature Fresh Pvt. Ltd. It was the understanding of the assessee that...

ITAT Deletes Addition Of Cash Deposited During demonetisation period by Retired Army Officer

The Banglore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) consisting of B.R. Baskaran (Accountant Member) deleted the addition of cash deposits during the demonetisation period on the ground that the retired army officer had withdrawn the cash to meet medical emergencies. The assessee is a retired army officer and is drawing a pension. During the demonetisation period, the...

Consideration For Resale Of Computer Software Is Not The Payment Of Royalty For Use Of Copyright In Computer Software: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) consisting of Chandra Mohan Garg (Judicial Member) and Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member) has held that consideration for the resale of the computer software through End User Licence Agreement (EULA)/distribution agreements is not the payment of royalty for the use of copyright in the computer software and, therefore, not taxable...

Assessee Discharges Primary Onus Submitting Documentary Evidence: ITAT Deletes Addition of Unexplained Cash Credits

The Raipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), consisting of Ravish Sood (Judicial Member) and Jamlappa D Battu​​ll (Accountant Member), has deleted the addition made on account of unexplained cash credits. The respondent/assessee is in the business of manufacturing M.S. ingots. The assessee had filed its return of income for the assessment year 2012-13 on September...

Monthly Digest Of Tax Cases: May 2022

Indirect Taxes Supreme Court GST Council Recommendations Not Binding On Centre & States; Both Parliament & State Legislatures Can Legislate On GST : Supreme Court Case Title : Union of India and Anr versus M/s Mohit Minerals Through Director Citation : 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 500 In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court held that the recommendations of the GST council...

Assessee Entitled To Additional Depreciation On The Power Plant And Installed Windmill: Delhi ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) consisting of Yogesh Kumar U.S. (Judicial Member) and B.R.R. Kumar (Accountant Member) has ruled that assessees are entitled to additional depreciation on the power plant and the installed windmill. The assessee/appellant is engaged in the fields of manufacturing and selling of sponge iron, billets, wire rod, TMT,...

Onus To Prove Identity, Creditworthiness And Genuineness Of Transaction Lies On Assessee: Pune ITAT

The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), consisting of Partha Artha Sarathi Chaudhury (Judicial Member) and Inturi Rama Rao (Accountant Member), has ruled that the onus to prove identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of a transaction lies with the assessee. The assessing officer found that during the year under consideration, the share capital of the company...

Tax Cases Weekly Round-Up: 22 May To 28 May 2022

Supreme Court Case Name: Union of India And Anr. v. M/s. Mohit Minerals Through Director Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 500 Separate IGST On Indian Importers For Ocean Freight Against Concept Of "Composite Supply", Violates Section 8 CGST Act : Supreme Court The Supreme Court has held when the Indian importer is liable to pay Integrated Goods and Services Tax (GST) on...

Loss Arising Out Of Sale Of Government Securities Is A Trading Loss: ITAT

The Visakhapatnam Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the loss arising out of the sale of government securities is a trading loss. The two-member bench of Duvvuru Rl Reddy (Judicial Member) and S. Balakrishnan (Accountant Member) observed that the treatment of securities of the AFS (available for sale) categories has to be seen in contradiction and contrast...

Income Tax Penalty Can't Be Imposed For Committing Unintentional Error In Form-16: ITAT

The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) consisting of S.S. Viswanethra Ravi (Judicial Member) and Inturi Rama Rao (Accountant Member) has ruled that the income tax penalty cannot be imposed for committing an unintentional error on Form-16. The appellant/assessee is an individual who filed a return declaring a total income of Rs. 5,39,360. A notice under section 143(2)...

Failure Of Assessee To Reply To Income Tax Notice Due To COVID: ITAT Directs Fresh Adjudication

The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the assessee could not respond to the notices in view of the pandemic situation, which has to be accepted as a reasonable cause.The two-member bench headed by N.V. Vasudevan (Vice President) and Chandra Poojari (Accountant Member) set aside the orders of the CIT (A) and remanded the issue to the CIT (A) for a...

Delay In Filing Appeal Based On COVID-19 Reasons: ITAT Imposes Penalty Of Rs.25,000

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) headed by Mahavir Singh (Vice President) and Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) has imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000 on the assessee for the delay of 1217 days in filing the appeal due to COVID-19. The appellant/assessee has challenged the order of CIT (A) in the matter of assessment framed by AO under section 143(3)...