Subscribe Premium
Quick Links

Evidence

Get Latest News, Breaking News about Evidence. Stay connected to all updated on Evidence

Income Tax Act | ITAT Delhi Grants Relief In S.10(10D) Dispute; AO Directed To Reassess ULIP Maturity Proceeds Treated as Unexplained Investment

Income Tax Act | ITAT Delhi Grants Relief In S.10(10D) Dispute; AO Directed To Reassess ULIP Maturity Proceeds Treated as Unexplained Investment

22 Nov 2025 10:50 AM IST

Arbitrator Is The Master of Evidence; Court In Appeal Cannot Reassess Facts: Delhi High Court

Arbitrator Is The Master of Evidence; Court In Appeal Cannot Reassess Facts: Delhi High Court

21 Nov 2025 11:10 AM IST

Documents Not Filed Before NCLT Cannot Be Entertained As Evidence By NCLAT For Deciding Appeal: NCLAT Chennai

Documents Not Filed Before NCLT Cannot Be Entertained As Evidence By NCLAT For Deciding Appeal: NCLAT Chennai

22 Oct 2025 5:40 PM IST

Counterclaim In Arbitration Cannot Be Allowed After Commencement Of Claimants Evidence: Calcutta High Court

Counterclaim In Arbitration Cannot Be Allowed After Commencement Of Claimant's Evidence: Calcutta High Court

7 Sept 2025 1:45 PM IST

Wedding Gifts Cant Be Automatically Treated As Unexplained Income Without Evidence: ITAT

Wedding Gifts Can't Be Automatically Treated As 'Unexplained Income' Without Evidence: ITAT

29 Aug 2025 3:15 PM IST

Loose Sheets And Private Diaries Not Sufficient Evidence For Excise Duty Demand: CESTAT

Loose Sheets And Private Diaries Not Sufficient Evidence For Excise Duty Demand: CESTAT

19 July 2025 2:30 PM IST

Statement Recorded U/S 108 Of Customs Act Is Not Valid Evidence U/S 138B Of Customs Act: CESTAT

Statement Recorded U/S 108 Of Customs Act Is Not Valid Evidence U/S 138B Of Customs Act: CESTAT

23 Jun 2025 7:10 PM IST

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Against BCCI, Directs Payment Of ₹538.9 Crore To Defunct IPL Franchise Kochi Tuskers Kerala

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Against BCCI, Directs Payment Of ₹538.9 Crore To Defunct IPL Franchise Kochi Tuskers Kerala

19 Jun 2025 10:56 AM IST

Arbitral Tribunal Is Sole Judge Of Evidence, Court Not Required To Re-Evaluate Evidence U/S 34 Of Arbitration Act: Delhi High Court

Arbitral Tribunal Is Sole Judge Of Evidence, Court Not Required To Re-Evaluate Evidence U/S 34 Of Arbitration Act: Delhi High Court

17 March 2025 7:50 PM IST

Court U/S 34 Of Arbitration Act Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence And Substitute Arbitrators Conclusion: Delhi High Court

Court U/S 34 Of Arbitration Act Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence And Substitute Arbitrator's Conclusion: Delhi High Court

19 Nov 2024 6:45 PM IST

Arbitral Tribunal Is The Fulcrum And The Facilitator For Taking Evidence Under Section 27 Of Arbitration And Conciliation Act: Telangana High Court

Arbitral Tribunal Is The Fulcrum And The Facilitator For Taking Evidence Under Section 27 Of Arbitration And Conciliation Act: Telangana High Court

19 Sept 2024 6:00 PM IST

Panchnama Not To Be Treated As Certificate Required For Admitting Printouts From Personal Computer As Evidence: CESTAT

Panchnama Not To Be Treated As Certificate Required For Admitting Printouts From Personal Computer As Evidence: CESTAT

11 Sept 2024 9:00 AM IST

X