FAOs And JAOs Have Concurrent Jurisdiction For Assessment, Re-assessment Or Re-Computation U/S 147 Income Tax Act: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court recently clarified that both the Faceless Assessment Officer and Jurisdictional Assessment Officer have concurrent jurisdiction as far as assessment, re-assessment or re-computation under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. “As far as the assessment, re-assessment or re-computation in terms of the provisions of Section 147 of the IT Act is concerned, both the FAO as well as the JAO will have concurrent jurisdiction,” the court ruled. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy made...

Tax Weekly Round-Up: 30th December 2024 - 5th January 2025

SUPREME COURT Motor Accident Claims - Tax Returns Can Be Accepted To Determine Income Only If They Are Appropriately Produced : Supreme Court Case name: New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Sonigra Juhi Uttamchand. Case no.: SLP (C) No. 30491 of 2018 The Supreme Court, recently (on January 02), while deciding a motor accident compensation claim case, observed that monthly income could be fixed after taking into account the tax returns. However, the details of tax payment must be...

Reassessment U/S 150 Of Income Tax Act Can't Be Initiated On Mere 'Incidental' Findings Of Appellate Authority: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that Section 150 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be invoked for reassessment only to give effect to a 'conclusive finding' by an appellate authority regarding escapement of income by an assessee. Section 150 makes provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal, etc. It empowers an Assessing Officer to issue reassessment notice under Section 148, to give effect to any finding or direction contained in an order passed by any...

Commissioner Cannot Use Its Power U/S 107(2) CGST Act To Review Order Passed By Appellate Authority: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has made it clear that a Commissioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 cannot, in purported exercise of its powers under Section 107(2), sit in appeal over an order passed by the Appellate Authority. Section 107(2) empowers the Commissioner to call for and examine the record of any proceedings in which an adjudicating authority has passed any order, for the purpose of satisfying himself of its legality. A division bench of Justices Yashwant Varma...

Designated Authority Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act Cannot Reopen Assessment After Issuance Of Final Certificate: Delhi HC Reiterates

The Delhi High Court has reiterated that a designated authority under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 cannot reopen an assessment after a final certificate is issued under Section 5 of the Act and all disputes with regard to the 'tax arrear' stand concluded. Section 5 stipulates a designated authority to determine the amount payable by a declarant under the Act within 15 days and grant a certificate (in Form no.5) containing particulars of the tax arrear and the amount payable...

Co-Accused Can Apply Separately For Compounding Of Offences Committed By Company Or HUF Under Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that co-accused are entitled to apply separately for compounding of offences committed by a Company or a Hindu Undivided Family under the Income Tax Act, 1961. A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela ruled that the co-accused need not await filing of application for compounding by the company or the HUF. In doing so, it relied upon the guidelines issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, stipulating that...

When Investigation Is Substantially Completed By Improper Officer, SCN Issued U/S 74 Of CGST Act Is Liable To Be Set Aside: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court held that when investigation is substantially completed by improper officer, show cause notice issued by proper officer u/s 74 of CGST Act is liable to be set aside. The Bench of Justice M.I. Arun observed that “…..substantial part of the investigation including search and seizure of the materials has been done by respondent no.2 who is not the proper Officer and under the circumstances, the said investigation, inspection, search and seizure in respect of the...

S.28 Customs Act | Keeping Matter In Call Book, Taking It Up After Several Years Is Not Permissible: Delhi HC Quashes SCN

The Delhi High Court has cautioned the Customs Authorities against keeping show-cause notices pending in call-book only to take them up after several years, leaving the assessee in lurch. A division bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Amit Sharma observed that in the absence of any “glaring impossibility”, such an approach of the authorities would not be permissible. In the case at hand, Petitioner challenged the delay of almost eight years in adjudication of the show-cause notice...

Delay In Filing Certified Copy Of Impugned Order Doesn't Render Appeal Filed Electronically U/S 107 CGST Act Time-Barred: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that delay in filing certified copy of impugned order in an appeal preferred by Assessee under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 would not render the appeal time-barred, if it was filed online within prescribed time. A division bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Amit Sharma reasoned, “the condition to physically file the certified copy of the impugned decision/order is not mandatory…where the certified copy was submitted...

Tax Monthly Digest: December 2024

SUPREME COURT Subsequent Purchaser Of Imported Vehicle Cannot Be Asked To Pay Customs Duty; Liability On Importer : Supreme Court Case Title: Nalin Choksey v. The Commissioner Of Customs, Kochi The Supreme Court ruled that the 'subsequent purchaser' of an imported motor car cannot be called an 'importer' to attract the liability under the Customs Act, 1962 to pay customs duty on the import of the vehicle. The bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice N Kotiswar Singh...

Charitable Society Looking After Socio-Economic And Welfare Matters Of Ex-Servicemen, Their Families Can Levy Service Tax: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court stated that services by charitable society who look after socio-economic and welfare matters of ex-serviceman and their families is liable to service tax. The Division Bench of Justices A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Easwaran S. observed that “for an association like the assessee, the embarking on a transaction that is designed to earn income for its members, would have to be seen as a commercial venture and the assessee who embarks on such a venture, a ...

Phrase "Where It Is Possible To Do" U/S 73(4B) Of Finance Act Doesn't Make Timeline To Determine Service Tax Dues 'Suggestive': Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the usage of expression "where it is possible to do so" doesn't make the timeline stipulated under Section 73(4B) of the Finance Act, 1994 to determine service tax dues 'suggestive' in nature. A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma observed, “...Section 73(4B) was framed and introduced in the Finance Act to ensure effective administration of taxation. While there cannot be denying that the taxation...